homepage

Hydraulic Lifters
 Moderated by: wingnut, wexy, tanygaer, redbaron, Patch, mikef, MDKramer, AZgl1500  
 New Topic   Reply   Printer Friendly 
AuthorPost
XCLR8N
Member


Joined: Tue Feb 1st, 2005
Location: Kelowna, British Columbia Canada
Posts: 43
Goldwing: GL1800
Mileage: 
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 

  back to top

 Posted: Sat Apr 8th, 2006 06:20 pm1st Post
 PM  Quote  Reply 
Except for additional maintenance costs there are no reasons for solid lifters. I have always adjusted the valves on my other bikes  but when I spend more than double for a Wing I would expect not to have to adjust valves.

I think I might have woke up on the wrong side of the bed.



____________________
2004 Candy Red GL1800
2004 Honda XR400 (dirtbike)
1999 Kawasaki Concours
1986 Yamaha Virago 1100


If I had known I was going to live this long I would have taken better care of myself... damn dirt bikes.

Steve
Grouchomax
Very Active Member
 

Joined: Tue Jul 6th, 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 236
Goldwing: GL1500 SE, GL1800
Mileage: 
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 

  back to top

 Posted: Wed Apr 26th, 2006 08:55 pm2nd Post
 PM  Quote  Reply 
Shim & bucket is preferred for sports type bikes, and the GL1800 has sporting pretensions. Also the use of timing chains instead of belts reduces the length of the engine by around 10mm and that is a major factor in being able to move the engine further forward to make more pillion room. I thing shim & bucket weigh less than the hydraulic lifter arrangemant as well, but I'm not 100% sure on that.

Don't get me wrong, I prefer the maintenance free hydraulic lifters and quieter rubber belts, but I can see why Honda went the other way wih the GL1800. :waving:



____________________
Max
Biker John
Very Active Member


Joined: Fri May 12th, 2006
Location: Michigan USA
Posts: 552
Goldwing: GL1800
Mileage: 20,000
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 

  back to top

 Posted: Sat May 20th, 2006 07:48 pm3rd Post
 PM  Quote  Reply 
What do the 1500's have? I know the hydraulic lifters in my 1200 never needed any attention for the whole 115,000 miles I rode it.
Honda should have stayed with the 1200 system.



____________________
John
2006 GL1800
Dark Red
Replaced 1984 ASP with over 115,000 fun miles

wingnut
Admin 1


Joined: Tue Jul 6th, 2004
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 2268
Goldwing: GL1800
Mileage: 5,700 miles
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 

  back to top

 Posted: Fri Jun 9th, 2006 10:51 pm4th Post
 PM  Quote  Reply 
The 1500's are hydraulic, and they are really reliable. They perform really well even with very high mileages and don't suffer the "stick lifter" problem that sometimes affects the GL1200.



____________________
Steve Saunders,
Admin and Founder Member.

exavid
Top Poster


Joined: Sun Sep 12th, 2004
Location: Medford, County Of Jackson, Oregon USA
Posts: 24696
Goldwing: GL1000, GL1100 Aspencade, GL1500 Aspencade
Mileage: 126,000
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 

  back to top

 Posted: Sat Jun 10th, 2006 02:00 am5th Post
 PM  Quote  Reply 
Yep, with 104k miles on the clock my '93 makes no mechanical noises when running, I'd prefer hydraulic lifters in anything. The Goldwing is supposed to be a luxury bike.



____________________
If you can't ride, fly or sail it, why bother?
Paul W.


Mad Meteor
Member


Joined: Wed Nov 22nd, 2006
Location: Washington St., USA
Posts: 4
Goldwing: GL1800
Mileage: 
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 

  back to top

 Posted: Wed Nov 22nd, 2006 02:34 pm6th Post
 PM  Quote  Reply 
C'mon Honda. Call the 1800 sporting if you like but there is no reason not to have hydraulic lifters on an engine with a rev-limiter set as low as it is on these machines. Further more they add unneeded noise to a bike that is supposed to be renowned for its quietness.


 Current time is 05:08 pm





WowUltra 1.15 Copyright © 2007-2008 by Jim Hale
Page processed in 0.5600 seconds (21% database + 79% PHP). 23 queries executed.