Although interesting in some light, I found the articleindicative of nothing more than desk jockeys justifying their jobs...it sounds like they took a lot of statistics and are makingclaims that will possiblylead theway for more control of the few freedoms we have left. I wear a helmet daily (along with other safety gear),but I don't want thefreedom to not wearto wearonetaken away. It would be just one more way of the government andbig businessgetting into our personal lives.
If they want to make riders wear helmets and relieve the insurance companies of liability (for that's what this is all about IMHO), make the law read that if you have a head injury while riding a motorcycle and not wearing a helmet, then your insurance company doesn't have to cover your head injury.
But then they're going to want us to wear leathers, boots, gloves, armor plating, training wheels, have air bags, automatic transmissions, etc. and eventually we might as wellbe in a car and still have high insurance rates. And I know that a lot of folks wear all the gear all the time and I'm not belittling that choice, butwe should still beable to make our ownchoices and live with the consequences.
After all, it seems insurance is just a gambling game...we're betting we'll have an accident (we put our money up and they hold it) and they're betting we don't (they don't put up any). If we don't have an accident, they're happy...they keep the money. If we have an accident, they have set the rates where they still make a fortune and are happy...and in Texas, you're required to have insurance.
OK, I'll get off my rant/stump now and think about scaring the crap out of the little goblins tomorrow night...Happy Halloween!

umpkin: