Steve Saunders Goldwing Forums banner

Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 20 of 28 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
14,148 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
imported post

This is another interesting article shared with me. I included the entire article I received, including the support and follow up links at the end.





BREAKING NEWS ON BIKERS SUING CITY OF BOSTON

Motorcycle Riders Seek Justice over Discriminatory Boston "Noise" Ordinance
News Release - for Immediate Release (July 10, 2009)

For more info, contact:
Paul W. Cote, [email protected] - 978-535-8222 (days)
Bill Gannon, [email protected]
Mike Longtin, [email protected]
Vince Silvia, [email protected] - 987-852-3626 (cell)
Larry Cahill, [email protected]

Boston, MA. Yesterday Suffolk Superior Court Judge Geraldine S. Hines, heard arguments today for a Motion seeking to temporarily restrain Boston's Law and Traffic Enforcement Agencies from enforcing City of Boston Ordinance Docket Number 0658, which calls for $300.00 fines on (only) motorcycle exhaust equipment not displaying a "readily visible" stamp that the system is approved by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency.

Judge Hines stated she would take their arguments under advisement and issue a decision soon.

Until her decision is rendered, the ordinance remains in effect.

If you ride, or even park your motorcycle in Boston and the EPA labeling is not readily visible, you remain liable for a $300.00 fine.

Attending the 2:00 p.m. hearing proposing the Motion for Injunctive Relief filed on July 3rd were Plaintiffs Paul W. Cote of Amesbury, Bill Gannon of Quincy, Vince Silvia of Haverhill, and Mike Longtin of North Easton, Massachusetts. The quartet, calling themselves the Massachusetts Riders for Justice Committee were joined by long time motorcyclists' advocate Betsy Lister of Medfor, Massachusetts. Plaintiff Larry Cahill was unable to attend the Hearing but gave his full support.

Following a noontime telephone briefing from American Motorcyclists Association (AMA) Government Relations Specialist Imre Szauter and ongoing communications with motorcyclists' rights activist Bruce Arnold, the Riders For Justice retained Motorcycling Attorney Joseph S. Provanzano of Peabody, Massachusetts who passionately argued the position of the plaintiffs.

Provanzano has successfully overturned more than 300 "excessive exhaust noise" citations against motorcyclists in court systems throughout Massachusetts.

"This is not about noise as much as it is about the local 'Crown' over-imposing unwarranted authority on citizens," claimed Plaintiff Cote'. "Over 235 years ago the citizens of Boston told the British Government "no way!" Today we are doing the same by seeking the Court to declare this Ordinance to be "the rubbish it is," claimed Cote.

"I attended today to be part of the solution," stated Plaintiff Longtin," and this Ordinance discriminating against motorcycling is wrong and I'm there to say so!"

Plaintiff Vince Silvia of Haverhill, who rode into the Boston Hearing with no EPA imprint on his bike’s exhaust systems, said, "It's crap. My motorcycle has passed State inspections and five voluntary sound tests with the sound meter donated by the AMA."

"This Ordinance is nothing but the City of Boston trying to make a buck off of riders. At $300.00 a pop, 100 bikes equal $30,000.00 to them, a 1,000 bikes equal $300,000.00. This ordinance," Silva continued, "is designed to discriminate against, as City Council Salvatore LaMattina testified, 'those people' to keep riders out of Boston. This is 'revenue enhancement', in its purest form. Add onto the ticket the costs of exercising your right to due process which will cost you as much as the original ticket, not to mention that parked or not it will be a moving violation which will just jack up your insurance rates. To me that equals government sanctioned theft."

Attorneys representing the City Boston were accompanied by a Sergeant of the Boston Police Department. He did not offer any testimony during the hearing. He later conferred with Plaintiffs Cote and Gannon stating "They dragged me in just for show. I have nothing against motorcyclists."

Observer Betsy Lister of Medford, Massachusetts was impressed by Provanzano's representation of the Plaintiff's position.

Lister stated, "Attorney Provanzano was armed and dangerous exuding passion and commitment to the cause while adeptly citing chapter and verse basically illustrating how the Boston's new noise ordinance usurped and superseded both federal and state statutes and was totally repugnant!"

"Provanzano threw out more legal challenges than an 'all star' pitcher in a series baseball game with each statement being a perfect strike." Lister continued.

Recently, Cahill, Cote, and Lister visited the Boston Harley-Davidson dealership and examined all new motorcycles on the showroom floor. Because of varied production styling and components, in most cases the activists could not view the EPA stamp unless the motorcycle is partially dismantled.

Riders For Justice Committee Members are patiently awaiting Judge Hines ruling on the temporary restraining order while their lawsuit to permanently overturn the ordinance was filed on July 3rd and prepares to go to a trial before the Suffolk County Superior Court.

Motorcycle riders interested in helping fight this Ordinance are encouraged to contact Paul Cote at [email protected].

See also:

http://tinyurl.com/kubhmd

Post questions or comments to:

http://tinyurl.com/napb66

A footnote on the real issue underlying Boston Noise Ordinance 0658:

"The real issue here is neither noise nor loud pipes, and I encourage the bikers' rights activists of Massachusetts not to be tricked into fighting on those fields. The real issue here is the same as in Myrtle Beach SC, and Delray Beach FL before that: A money-hungry municipality overstepping its authority and passing discriminatory ordinances aimed at filling city coffers by penalizing all bikers for the alleged transgressions of a few."--Bruce Arnold

***

SUPPORT BRUCE'S RIGHTS RIDERS LIST BY DONATING HERE:

http://support.ldrlongdistancerider.com

"The battle for bikers' rights is not about patches, parties or poker runs. We fight to protect the freedom and promote the interests of American motorcyclists ... to defend our right to choose our own modes of transportation, attire and lifestyle ... to deter and defy discrimination against us ... and to vanquish those who violate our rights or right-of-way. And in the end, it will not matter to us whether we won or lost. But it will matter to us greatly that we fought."--Bruce Arnold

***

TELL A FRIEND ABOUT BRUCE'S RIGHTS RIDERS LIST

Please forward this email to fellow riders on your contacts list, or use the TELL A FRIEND box here:

http://rightsriders.ldrlongdistancerider.com

***

THE LATEST BIKERS' RIGHTS NEWS

The latest headlines for motorcyclists' rights, motorcycle awareness, helmet laws, noise ordinances and motorists' failure to yield by category are now available 24/7. Here is the link to add to your web browser favorites or bookmarks:

http://bikernews.ldrlongdistancerider.com
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
10,509 Posts
imported post

Just when did they start requiring the EPA stickers on bikes? Does anyone know? My 82 1100 sure doesn't have one. Guess I'll never ride it in Boston.
 

·
Administrator
02 GL1800 w/Auto Pilot
Joined
·
60,722 Posts
imported post

I have never had a hankering to see Boston, but if I did, I would not bother with stopping to show off a sticker even if it were on my bike.

They can not legislate my right to drive through their town. They might want to, but I get real noisy, real quick when I get violated.
 

·
Administrator
02 GL1800 w/Auto Pilot
Joined
·
60,722 Posts
imported post

Well, they can't legislate where the manufacturer posts that. and I doubt seriously they will ever decide to print that in an area where it would destroy the beauty of the bike.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
14,148 Posts
Discussion Starter #6
imported post

AZgl1500 wrote:
I have never had a hankering to see Boston, but if I did, I would not bother with stopping to show off a sticker even if it were on my bike.

They can not legislate my right to drive through their town. They might want to, but I get real noisy, real quick when I get violated.
That's the whole point. They are trying to legislate your right away. They are doing so by discriminating against motorcycles in general. And that is the grounds of the lawsuit.

Instead of enforcing a noise ordinance, they are just outrighttrampling the rights of motorcyclists. So someone is getting real noisy. (they beat you to it.)



But if you did go to Boston, you might just experience the same, especially if there is an anti-motorcycle attitude encouraged within Boston's finest.



We should all converge on Boston all at the same time. Have our own Boston Tea Party.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
14,148 Posts
Discussion Starter #7
imported post

AZgl1500 wrote:
Well, they can't legislate where the manufacturer posts that. and I doubt seriously they will ever decide to print that in an area where it would destroy the beauty of the bike.
Again that is part of the problem. The article talked about a tour of a Harley showroom. Lot's of bikes the label is there, but it isn't visible without removing parts from the bike. So the bike is perfectly legal, but the police are "enforcing" the law based on visibility of the label, and not on actual noise.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,545 Posts
imported post

I live 35 miles from Boston and Boston is the last place to ride on places I would like to go.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
343 Posts
imported post

now if boston is as busy as i think it is , why would a bike noise even bother them , horns honking , jets flying , buses roaring , how can 1 noise be any more worst then another ,
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,765 Posts
imported post

Just another good reason for me to stay out of Boston:action:
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
12,802 Posts
imported post

Isn't Boston the City of Brotherly Love :? . Any how I would like to know where this label is located on Automobiles and how they can target only bikes . Yep its the old money grab . I tell ya folks its going to get a lot worse . T.E.A. anyone ?
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
454 Posts
imported post

No That's philadelphia. Boston is home of the tea party and baked beans.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
743 Posts
imported post

i live north of boston ,i hate going to boston ,i go thier on road calls for busses broken down you cant even hear yourself think and if thier is a harley with loud pipes you can barely hear it :action:, like said on here between the busses,trucks ,horns,trains and the construction its loud not to mention the people are rude. so all they are looking to get from this is "THE ALMIGHTY DOLLAR"





i'm not a fan of loud pipes butwith all that noise the harley is a welcome sound
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,004 Posts
imported post

LUV2WING wrote:
Just another good reason for me to stay out of Boston:action:
What he said!
 
G

·
imported post

Well i used to drive trucks in and out if there.
Was glad when i retired from that.
So nope i aint goin to boston on my wing.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
546 Posts
imported post

Nothing from Mass surprises me. I was born there and grew up 45 mins from Boston. There is no way they can enforce that unless they target every vehicle on the road. It is just another money grab from a state actually called "Taxachusetts".
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
206 Posts
imported post

It's hard to find the right words. Scum comes to mind..
Wolfman thanx for posting this attack !
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
743 Posts
imported post

if and when the housing market comes back:shock: the wife and i plan on selling and moving out of taxachusetts as the name is back since they changed the tax rate from 5% to 6.25% we call them legal thiefs:(
 

·
Administrator
02 GL1800 w/Auto Pilot
Joined
·
60,722 Posts
imported post


...Is that the state income tax rate, or the Sales Tax rate?

If sales tax, our local sales tax is 8.75% now. Our state income tax is 19.5% of your Federal Tax owed.
 
1 - 20 of 28 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top