Steve Saunders Goldwing Forums banner

GL1200 Rotor Thickness Experiences

1865 Views 7 Replies 6 Participants Last post by  tricky
I currently have the rear wheel/drive of my 84 GL1200 replacing tire, lube splines, fix wheel bearing, etc. I checked the thickness on the rear rotor and it is 5.6 mm. I know that this is 0.4 mm below the spec limit of 6.0 mm. I am trying to limit how much more I spend on the bike at this time so I was wondering how thin have people run the rear rotor until they discovered it was out of spec, and if they had any noticeable problems.

Thanks,
Lee
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
My rear rotor also on an 84 is down to 5.1mm and I've not noticed any problems.
I do have a new rotor sitting on the bench, just haven't taken the time to install it.
If it had a problem it would be in warping. So if you start feeling a nasty vibration out of the pedal you'll know what it is, otherwise ride on :waving:.
Thanks. It does not seem to have any warping. I will be replacing the pads, since they look a little thin.
The only thing I'd check with a thin rotor and thin pad is to be sure to clean the caliper pistons when putting new pads on since there'd be a goodly length of piston wall exposed in that condition.
Paul,
Good reminder I had not thought about. I should always remember doing the piston cleaning because I did not do this once (only the first time) on the front brakes on my new 84 650 Nighthawk and then the brakes would drag. I eventually took them apart to clean everything up and replaced the seals, which resolved the self created problem.
Lee
My rear rotor got so thin that OEM pads wouldn't work. I had to use the thicker EBC pads on it, or the metal part of the pad would rub the unworn part of the rotor.
Stopping is better than starting..... if it is out of spec change it, these things usually fail when you need them most.
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top