since goldwings are heavy bikes naked, then add luggage, riders and gear i would be more interested in a tires weight rating more than the speed rating.
I haven't heard anything bad about the shinko's.Hello all,
I purchased a pair of Shinko tires a couple of weeks ago.
The front tire is great...however, the rear...not so great.
I just pulled off my 2nd. bad tire in a week.
Both tires developed a high spot, about a foot long. Is it just a fluke that
I could have got 2 bad tires, or are they just not strong enough?.
For the day or so that they stayed round...it was a very nice ride.
The are V rated, which I assumed was a good thing, however, talking to an
independent bike mechanic today, he says I will likely be better off with
the H rating as they likely will have stiffer sidewalls.
Not sure about if there is truth to that or not.
Maybe, if someone has the time...they could enlighten me.
Tomorrow, when I go to the bike shop...I'm seriously considering paying
the difference and getting an E3.
In any event...I think my next set of tires will be E3's.
Wish me luck tomorrow.
Which is why the shinko rated so high. The load rating was even greater than the E-III's. Besides, my wing wouldn't do 140mph if you dropped it out of an airplane.since goldwings are heavy bikes naked, then add luggage, riders and gear i would be more interested in a tires weight rating more than the speed rating.
I was not satisfied with the mileage I got for the Shinko rear tire it rode great at first and I ran it until the wires or ropes started showing and the treads were long gone. I won't be running them again. I think the 404's are better but I'm probably going to try the Michelin Commander II or Bridgestone S11 Spitfire. e3's are a possibility also.
Shinko not so good for me 2up and loaded down.
Not so hard with a decent dealer maybe!I haven't heard anything bad about the shinko's.
But if ever there was a reason for buying and mounting your tires at a motorcycle shop, this would be it.
Imagine trying to correct this problem mail order?:shock:
Now I agree with you on that one!Which is why the shinko rated so high. The load rating was even greater than the E-III's. Besides, my wing wouldn't do 140mph if you dropped it out of an airplane.
Then the 404 isn't rated well for weight and really belongs on an un-bagged cruiser.
Hello all,
I purchased a pair of Shinko tires a couple of weeks ago.
What model Shinko tires you buy? For any heavy cruiser/ tourer I believe the 230s are the recommended tire due to their load rating.
So far I like my 230'sI ran Shinko 230's on my 1200 LTD and loved it. Only got 8000 miles out of it, but for $85 I wasn't expecting much, However it gave a great ride.
Went to 491's and they lasted 3 or 4 thousand miles...... they sucked!
Im running a Michelin Commander II on there now and like it a lot. Gives that Cadillac ride like the Shinko did but seems to be wearing very well. After a couple thousand miles, no signs of wear yet.
I don't believe that the right tires were used from Shinko for the Goldwing in this case.:shock:A bad tire is possible with any mfg. Two in succession would lead me to seek an alternative.
I've got a bridge for sale, you maybe interested.:wtf:They informed me the tire will get smoother with some miles on it.