It's better in my opinion than the Suzuki Bergman 400 in that it's two cylinder and about 40% more power.
In a word, Yes. The extra steam is nice to have on the freeway and the two cylinder engine is a good bit smoother. I've ridden all three the SW, the 400cc and 650cc Bergman scooters and prefer the SW. To me the 650 was too complicated in it's drive system, it's basically a CVT but it's also electrically controlled. The 400 has a much simpler CVT system much like the SW. When the belt need changing it's going to be a lot more expensive and time consuming on the B650. The SW's mechanical transmission system is robust and simple, no electrical gremlins there. The Bergman 650 is a good bit higher priced as well. It all depends on what you're looking for in a scooter. All three of these scooters are great and really blur the difference between motor scooters and motorcycles. I've met several people who are touring on these things. A couple of guys who I met at Crater Lake were from the SF Bay area and were on their way home on their two B400s after visiting British Columbia and Glacier National Park. I came across a guy in McMinville last summer who was riding a Silverwing with a side car. He told me about a company that trikes them too.exavid wrote:Are you comparing a 600+cc bike with the 400 Burgman and saying it's better cause it's more powerful?It's better in my opinion than the Suzuki Bergman 400 in that it's two cylinder and about 40% more power.
Sold the SW for $300 more than I paid for the '95 Tracker. It was a fun little scoot but it was taking riding time away from the 1800. The only downside, though it's probably a good thing, is that I no longer have the scooter to jump on in shorts and sandals to run an errand in town.I thought you were kidding about the trade for the Tracker, until I saw you pull out of the lot at breakfast. Get a good deal on the trade?
That's definitely a good thing. I really didn't want to hear about you recovering from road rash my friend. :waving: I am sad that I didn't get a chance to ride it before you sold it though.:action: My only maxi-scooter experience was on the 400 Burgman I bought for my wife a few years back.The only downside, though it's probably a good thing, is that I no longer have the scooter to jump on in shorts and sandals to run an errand in town.
Suzuki also have a twin cylinder650 version. It has some things the Honda doesn't, like handlebar gearshift buttons, electric screen and mirrorstoo.exavid wrote:It's better in my opinion than the Suzuki Bergman 400 in that it's two cylinder and about 40% more power.
Are you comparing a 600+cc bike with the 400 Burgman and saying it's better cause it's more powerful?
John,exavid wrote:That's definitely a good thing. I really didn't want to hear about you recovering from road rash my friend. :waving: I am sad that I didn't get a chance to ride it before you sold it though.:action: My only maxi-scooter experience was on the 400 Burgman I bought for my wife a few years back.The only downside, though it's probably a good thing, is that I no longer have the scooter to jump on in shorts and sandals to run an errand in town.
John